Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Ahmed, S and El-Sayegh, S (2022) The challenges of sustainable construction projects delivery – evidence from the UAE. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 299–312.

Aydin, Y C and Mirzaei, P A (2022) A novel mathematical model to measure individuals’ perception of the symmetry level of building facades. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 261–78.

Behnia, B, Kheirollahi, M, Sahragard, M and Soltanifar, A (2022) A conceptual model for children’s participation in the architectural design process: exploring deep participation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 344–67.

Dao, B, Kermanshachi, S, Shane, J, Anderson, S and Damnjanovic, I (2022) Developing a logistic regression model to measure project complexity. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 226–40.

Eilouti, B (2022) Form follows users: a framework for system-based design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 204–25.

Ismail, S, Che Ibrahim, C K I, Belayutham, S and Mohammad, M Z (2022) Analysis of attributes critical to the designer’s prevention through design competence in construction: the case of Malaysia. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 325–43.

Kamal, E M, Lou, E C, Yusof, N and Osmadi, A (2022) Absorptive capacity of Malaysian SME construction organisations. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 313–24.

Laovisutthichai, V, Lu, W and Bao, Z (2022) Design for construction waste minimization: guidelines and practice. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 279–98.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Design for construction waste minimization; architectural design; façade design; construction waste management; Designing out waste;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1745-2007
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1862043
  • Abstract:
    Design for Construction Waste Minimization (DfCWM) advocates the proactive minimization of potential construction waste from the design or earlier stage. Numerous DfCWM practices have been recommended, but they are hitherto in a piecemeal fashion without an integrative guideline to enable designers to consider DfCWM in a systematic manner. Their practice examples and application results have also been rarely investigated. This study aims to amalgamate DfCWM recommendations, develop practicable guidelines, and implement in real-world settings. It adopts a design thinking method to develop the guidelines from literature, brainstorming, action research, case study, and most importantly, dynamic iteration thereof. The results affirm the impact of DfCWM on not only preventing construction waste generation effectively but reducing the construction cost without jeopardizing the design. However, its implementation is not merely a simple linear process and requires coordination from all stakeholders. For practitioners, this research also provides the DfCWM guidelines to be a design companion, encouraging deliberation of an entire building and material life cycle with special consideration given to waste minimization. Further studies are suggested for two areas: (a) modelling DfCWM into a multi-criteria optimization problem, and (b) integrating it with other design for excellence considerations.

Leistner, S, Honold, C, Maierhofer, M, Haase, W, Blandini, L, Sobek, W, Roth, D, Binz, H and Menges, A (2022) Research on integral design and planning processes for adaptive buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 241–60.

Mediastika, C E, Sudarsono, A S and Kristanto, L (2022) Indonesian shopping malls: a soundscape appraisal by sighted and visually impaired people. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 184–203.

Sutrisna, M, Ramnauth, V and Zaman, A (2022) Towards adopting off-site construction in housing sectors as a potential source of competitive advantage for builders. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(03), 165–83.